PMQs

Post Reply
User avatar
Bat Macdui
Posts: 20333
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2015 11:19 am

Re: PMQs

Post by Bat Macdui »

lazzbo wrote: Tue Jan 25, 2022 2:42 pm What happens if he loses the vote of no confidence, does he have to go?
He needs to resign and it automatically triggers a leadership contest and we all start saying things like 'who the fuck is Tugendhat?'
Last edited by Bat Macdui on Tue Jan 25, 2022 2:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Bat Macdui
Posts: 20333
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2015 11:19 am

Re: PMQs

Post by Bat Macdui »

The bit I'm finding quite funny at the moment is how Johnson was apparently told first thing about the police investigation but didn't actually mention it in his Cabinet Meeting. Presumably he was a bit bothered Rishi would be cross. :lol:
Edith Bacon
Posts: 20047
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 3:15 pm

Re: PMQs

Post by Edith Bacon »

The constant repetition of ‘But he was only there for ten minutes’ is driving me crazy because at no time were we told that it was ok to celebrate with 30 people as long as it was only for ten minutes.
Mountain Goat
Posts: 27214
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 12:14 pm
Location: London

Re: PMQs

Post by Mountain Goat »

Pippa Crerar now reporting that the Sue Gray report is expected to be received tonight and published tomorrow ahead of PMQs.
Protected by the ejaculation of serpents
User avatar
Bat Macdui
Posts: 20333
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2015 11:19 am

Re: PMQs

Post by Bat Macdui »

I'm going to have to tell my new manager that this Wednesday lunchtime team meeting time just doesn't work for me. :))
User avatar
rosy
Posts: 47270
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 8:26 pm

Re: PMQs

Post by rosy »

Has any politician seen this report from Sue Gray yet? If not, there’s no point in anyone asking questions about it at PMQs.
It’s like a normal midlife crisis only with more chandeliers and foreign languages.
Wiggle
Posts: 3564
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 7:02 am

Re: PMQs

Post by Wiggle »

The usual blah, blah, blah of "look how good the government has been on xyz".
User avatar
Morganna
Posts: 17320
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 7:25 pm
Location: Avalon

Re: PMQs

Post by Morganna »

That was disappointing. I should have known it would be a damp squib, I suppose, as clearly they are buying time - although goodness knows how they plan to use it, as they are totally bang to rights - but I had still hoped for something a bit more momentous (not to say entertaining :look:)
User avatar
sally maclennane
Posts: 49056
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 7:01 pm

Re: PMQs

Post by sally maclennane »

And now it's come out that he did authorise the evacuation of that guys animals. I don't want to start up the debate about whether or not they should have been evacuated, the fact is that they repeatedly denied that he authorised it..

Predictably his wife is getting the blame for this, and while I'm not keen on women taking the blame, i can only imagine how the media would have reacted to Tony Blair making a decision like that and how Cherie would have been vilified.
Christ on a bendy bus son, don't be such a fucking faff arse
lazzbo
Posts: 3709
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2019 3:10 pm

Re: PMQs

Post by lazzbo »

She's a twat, he's a twat and they're ideally matched. He's toast once the report comes out, so I hope he enjoyed one of his last PMQs. :duo:
User avatar
sally maclennane
Posts: 49056
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 7:01 pm

Re: PMQs

Post by sally maclennane »

Let's hope so (that he's toast!)
Christ on a bendy bus son, don't be such a fucking faff arse
lazzbo
Posts: 3709
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2019 3:10 pm

Re: PMQs

Post by lazzbo »

I have been proven to think too optimistically in the past, it must be said. :))
User avatar
Morganna
Posts: 17320
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 7:25 pm
Location: Avalon

Re: PMQs

Post by Morganna »

I'm with you in the optimism corner, Lazz. I don't see how he can possibly maintain credibility in the face of so much proof that he's a lying bastard. I'm less optimistic about who would replace him, though. Can the Queen not step in and dissolve parliament or something, so we need a GE? If I were her age I'd be tempted to make a few sweeping changes before I went to the big throne in the sky.
User avatar
Bat Macdui
Posts: 20333
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2015 11:19 am

Re: PMQs

Post by Bat Macdui »

I'm still in the longer term thinking camp of hoping he survives because the longer he's there, the more damage he does to Tories. The local elections could be a marvellous free for all of cake and wallpaper memes. :love2: As opposed to, say, getting Tugendhat in and he then goes full hawk on Putin and pulls in the nationalistic wankers by waving a picture of himself in a tank.

For the geeky, Playbook is good on morning SITREP. With flowchart. :love2: I haven't seen a good flowchart since the heady days of Brexit votes.
Mountain Goat
Posts: 27214
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 12:14 pm
Location: London

Re: PMQs

Post by Mountain Goat »

That is so good and precious. :love2:
Protected by the ejaculation of serpents
User avatar
cluefree
Posts: 22509
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2008 5:27 pm

Re: PMQs

Post by cluefree »

That is a GREAT flowchart. Needs more angry bears as an option though.
User avatar
rosy
Posts: 47270
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 8:26 pm

Re: PMQs

Post by rosy »

Joe Lycett put up a 'redacted report' on Insta :mog:

https://www.instagram.com/p/CZO2RoUIcmy/
It’s like a normal midlife crisis only with more chandeliers and foreign languages.
Mountain Goat
Posts: 27214
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 12:14 pm
Location: London

Re: PMQs

Post by Mountain Goat »

Credible take here on the possible reasons for the Met's suspicious behaviour today (just today's suspicious behaviour, not the raft of other stuff...)

https://thesecretbarrister.com/2022/01/ ... nt-report/
Protected by the ejaculation of serpents
Edith Bacon
Posts: 20047
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 3:15 pm

Re: PMQs

Post by Edith Bacon »

Oh, that’s a very clear and sensible explanation. Thank you for sharing it, Goaty McGoatface.
User avatar
Livilla
Posts: 25419
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:36 am
Location: London

Re: PMQs

Post by Livilla »

Yes - having had the Met trample all over my (regulatory) investigations with their (criminal) boots on in the past, today’s developments didn’t come as such a surprise to me. The surprising part is that they waited so long to announce this - but I can well imagine there’s been some wrangling behind the scenes. In my experience the Met start with the position that any competing investigation should be put on ice until they finish theirs up entirely. Here the position they’ve ended up with is redactions, but the report still published - I suspect the huge public interest in this played a part.
Post Reply